Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Going Full B. Todd

ATF’s classification of the plaintiff’s device as a silencer within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(24) is correct, reasonable, in accordance with the law, considered all relevant data and thus was not arbitrary and capricious. [More]
ATF's "Answer to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Sig Sauer v ATF": Of course it's not, of course it didn't and of course it was...

[Via everrest]

1 comment:

Maxwell said...

Muzzle BRAKE! Muzzle BRAKE! Damn it, why must I suffer legislation by morons who have abso-f***ing-lutely NO knowledge of what they're legislating, nor why?

Screw these bastards, they lost me right from 'go'.